Consistency formulas and thresholds are not interchangeable. The same firm can use different rules for evaluation, simulated funding, and payout cycles. Use this table to shortlist firms, then read the linked plan details and provider terms.
Consistency listed by firm
| Firm | Consistency listed | Starting price (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| My Funded Futures | 30ג€“50% in eval ֲ· none funded (Builder 50% per payout cycle) | $105 |
| Lucid Trading | Flex/Daily 50% in eval ֲ· Pro funded 40% ֲ· Direct 20% | $89 |
| FundedNext Futures | Legacy/Flex 40% in eval ֲ· Rapid Pro 40% funded ֲ· Rapid Daily none | $79.99 |
| Apex Trader Funding | None in eval ֲ· 50% on PA (Legacy 30%) | $167 |
| Funded Futures Family | Prime/Premier/Velocity 40% funded ֲ· S2F 25% ֲ· Base none funded | $79 |
| Top One Futures | ACCESS 40% funded ֲ· Daily 40% eval ֲ· Instant 20% ֲ· Ignite 15% | $39 |
| Take Profit Trader | 50% in eval only | $150 |
| Topstep | 55% in Combine ֲ· XFA Consistency 40% | $49 |
| Alpha Futures | Zero none ֲ· Standard 50% ֲ· Advanced 40% in eval ֲ· funded 40% (Advanced none, Direct 20%) | $89 |
How to use this comparison
Read the firm’s plan details before comparing headline terms. One provider may use different rules during evaluation, simulated funding and live funding. The provider’s current rules govern your account.
For the full data and selection criteria, see the comparison methodology and data verification notes.
Explore the comparison
See the futures prop firm comparison table, browse individual firm data, or read our comparison methodology.